[TAG] Design of a Protocol Monkey

[Predrag Ivanovic]

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 13:44:10 -0500
Lew Pitcher wrote:
 
> 2) A non-frivolous interpretation of the "IMPS" RFC suggests that a program 
> (or suite of programs) could exercise any given protocol by throwing random 
> data at it. The more randomness and the more data generated, the likelier 
> that acceptable traffic for that protocol would be generated. This could be 
> one way to test the robustness of a protocol (albeit, a very expensive and 
> time consuming way). Again, the prof should be able to shed some light on it.

This sounds like fuzzing to me?